List of Businesses That Will Be Overcrowded in 2026

We research digital businesses every day, if you're building in this space, get our market clarity reports

Twenty-three digital markets are dead zones in 2026. Funding dropped 73-90%, customer acquisition costs doubled, and 2-3 players now control 50-70% of each category.

AI tools, SaaS, and creator platforms see 90%+ failure rates within 18 months. Founders still jump in based on 2020-2021 success stories that don't apply anymore. Our market clarity reports show the real numbers behind the hype.

Our market clarity reports contain between 100 and 300 insights about your market.

The 23 Most Overcrowded Digital Markets You Should Avoid in 2026

• 1. AI Chatbots and Conversational AI Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  The market hit $7.76 billion with ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Claude dominating. 69% of AI funding went to mega-rounds above $100 million. Everyone else fights over scraps. 90-92% of AI startups fail within their first year.

  Why it's still profitable for incumbents:

  Enterprise contracts run $50,000-500,000 annually with strong retention once companies train their data into platforms. But new entrants can't compete when Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI bundle everything free with tools businesses already use.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Founders believe vertical specialization or better UX will work. ChatGPT adds industry features faster than startups ship. Artifact got 444,000 downloads and still failed.

  What to do instead:

  Build extensions for existing AI platforms. Focus on industries where compliance creates barriers general AI can't solve (healthcare, legal, finance).

  Sources: RAND Corporation, CB Insights

• 2. AI Writing and Content Generation Tools

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 50 competitors (ChatGPT, Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, Grammarly) fight for market share. 58% of marketers use AI writing tools, yet 71% manually edit everything to sound human. Free tiers everywhere. Race to the bottom.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Content creation is $400+ billion and businesses need fresh content constantly. But nobody solved the "sounds robotic" problem, so there's no justification for premium pricing over free alternatives.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Founders see $400B and think 0.1% equals success. When ChatGPT and Grammarly add the same features within weeks with free tiers, differentiation dies.

  What to do instead:

  Focus on ultra-specific cases where compliance matters. Medical writing with FDA requirements, legal docs with jurisdiction rules, financial content with SEC standards. Customers pay $500-2,000/month because mistakes create legal risk.

  Sources: Gartner, Exploding Topics

• 3. AI Image Generation Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  15+ platforms compete: DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Google Imagen, Microsoft Designer. Getty and Shutterstock merged for $3.7 billion because of AI pressure. 15 billion images generated daily, but only 36% of marketers use these tools.

  Why it appears profitable:

  Stock photo markets represent billions annually. Enterprise pays $100-500/month for unlimited generations. But Midjourney does $200M+ revenue with 16 employees, and Adobe bakes Firefly into Photoshop where designers already work.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better prompts, specific styles, vertical focus (real estate, products). Foundation models improve monthly. Our market clarity reports show most "specialized" generators wrap the same models with thin layers competitors copy in days.

  What to do instead:

  Build workflow tools around AI images, not generators. Asset management (tagging, organizing, licensing), brand compliance checkers, design workflow integrators. Focus on $10B design collaboration, not commoditized generation.

  Sources: Markets and Markets, Statista

• 4. AI Coding Assistants

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  81% developer adoption but market only grew from $18.7 million to projected $92.5 million by 2030. GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, Google Duet AI dominate with free tiers. Microsoft loses money on Copilot at $10/month to lock in GitHub users.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Developers spend 35-50% of time on repetitive tasks. 28 million developers worldwide. High adoption at near-zero prices means served but not monetizable.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better code quality, specific languages, security features. Microsoft, Amazon, Google improve models monthly and add languages within weeks. Competing on quality against companies training on trillions of tokens is delusional.

  What to do instead:

  Build for regulated environments big players won't touch. Air-gapped security for defense contractors, company-specific standards enforcement, assistants for legacy languages (COBOL, Fortran). These pay $500-5,000/developer annually.

  Sources: Gartner, Stack Overflow

• 5. Project Management and Productivity SaaS

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 600 tools exist. Funding dropped 73% from $17.4 billion to $4.7 billion. Monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Notion, Microsoft Project control 50-65% share. Customer acquisition costs doubled to $1,450+.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Businesses complain tools are too complex, too simple, don't fit workflows. Market projects growth to $15.8 billion by 2030. But growth comes from existing players expanding (Notion adding wikis, Monday adding CRM), not new entrants.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better UX, specific workflows, vertical focus. Every PM tool now offers customizable workflows, dozens of views, industry templates. They add vertical features faster than you ship.

  What to do instead:

  Build extensions for dominant platforms. Monday.com apps for industries (construction with AIA forms, agencies with client portals), Notion templates for use cases (fundraising CRM, product roadmaps). Monday.com marketplace has thousands of extensions serving 152,000+ companies.

  Sources: Crunchbase, Bessemer Cloud Index

• 6. EdTech and Online Learning Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  EdTech funding collapsed 89% from $20.8 billion in 2021 to $2.4 billion in 2024. Q1 2025 delivered only $410 million globally. Retention rates hit 1.76% (students complete less than 2% of courses). Coursera, Udemy, LinkedIn Learning, YouTube dominate.

  Why it appears underserved:

  $5-8 trillion education market, only 10-15% digitized. Completion rates below 2% suggest current platforms don't work. But low completion isn't a product problem. It's human behavior. 98% don't finish because they lack accountability and deadlines traditional education provides.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Gamification, better pedagogy, community features, niche topics. Duolingo mastered gamification with 500 million users and still sees 95%+ churn. YouTube offers unlimited free learning. Adding community doesn't solve the fundamental problem.

  What to do instead:

  Focus on corporate training with mandatory compliance. Healthcare staff needing HIPAA training, financial advisors requiring continuing education, construction workers needing safety certifications. These pay $50-200 per employee annually with 90%+ completion because training is required for employment.

  Sources: HolonIQ, Insider Intelligence

• 7. Meditation and Mental Wellness Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 2,500 meditation apps compete. Headspace and Calm dominate with 100+ million combined downloads and $300+ million revenue. 90% of users churn within 30 days, 95% never complete a course, monthly active users average 3-5% of downloads.

  Why it appears profitable:

  Mental health is $460 billion market growing at 11.7% CAGR. Paid subscribers spend $60-90 annually. Market projects growth to $10.4 billion by 2033. But growth concentrates in top 2-3 apps while thousands fight for scraps. Calm spent $50+ million on marketing in 2023 alone.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific audiences (meditation for entrepreneurs, anxiety for teenagers), better content, novel approaches. Headspace and Calm add programs faster than startups ship. YouTube offers unlimited free meditation. When 95% never complete a course, the problem isn't content quality.

  What to do instead:

  Build mental health tools for B2B (employers) not B2C. Workplace platforms integrating with HR systems, tracking utilization for compliance. Target industries with specific requirements (healthcare workers, first responders, military). Employers pay $50-150 per employee annually.

  Sources: Grand View Research, Business of Apps

• 8. Fitness and Workout Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 71,000 health apps on iOS alone. Peloton, Apple Fitness+, Nike Training Club, Strava control 60%+ share. Peloton lost 90% of market value ($50B to $5B). Free alternatives like YouTube (10 million+ fitness videos) cannibalize paid apps. Retention drops below 10% after 30 days.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Obesity rising, only 28% of Americans meet exercise guidelines. Consumer spending on fitness apps hit $2.9 billion. But vast majority of fitness consumption happens on free platforms. Paid apps face $50-150 customer acquisition costs competing with thousands of free alternatives.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific workout types (HIIT, yoga, Pilates), target audiences (seniors, pregnant women), better personalization. YouTube already offers unlimited free content for every type. Instagram influencers provide coaching for $20-50/month. Apple bundles Fitness+ into subscriptions millions already pay for.

  What to do instead:

  Focus on enterprise, not consumers. Workplace fitness platforms integrating with health insurance, tracking participation for premium discounts. Companies pay $100-300 per employee annually, retention exceeds 70%. Or create tools for physical therapists (patient exercise prescription, rehab tracking). Healthcare providers pay $200-1,000/month.

  Sources: Statista, Grand View Research

• 9. Language Learning Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Duolingo dominates with 500+ million users, $500+ million revenue, 95%+ brand recognition. Market consolidated: Babbel acquired multiple competitors, Rosetta Stone acquired twice. Free alternatives proliferate (YouTube, ChatGPT for practice). Completion rates below 5%.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Market projects growth from $82 billion to $191 billion by 2031. Corporate language training is $15+ billion. Duolingo's 5% completion suggests room for better effectiveness. But reaching fluency requires 600-750 hours. 95% lack discipline regardless of app quality.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific languages, better methods, specific audiences. Duolingo offers 40+ languages free with best gamification and still sees 95% quit. ChatGPT provides unlimited free practice. When the #1 player with 500 million users can't crack 5% completion, launching better won't change human behavior.

  What to do instead:

  Target corporate training where employers mandate completion and pay $200-500 per employee annually. Focus on specific corporate use cases (medical professionals learning Spanish for patients, customer service for international clients). Achieve 70-90% completion through job requirements.

  Sources: Statista, Duolingo Investor Relations


For each competitor, our market clarity reports look at how they address (or fail to address) market pain points. If they don't, it highlights a potential opportunity for you.

• 10. Personal Finance and Budgeting Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 8,000 personal finance apps compete. Mint, YNAB, Personal Capital, Credit Karma control 70%+ share. Intuit shut down Mint in January 2024 after 20 years because it couldn't monetize. Banks embed budgeting features free. Monthly active users represent 5-8% of downloads.

  Why it appears profitable:

  78% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Apps see 2.4 billion downloads globally. Premium subscriptions command $50-100 annually. But Mint generated only $100 million at peak despite 20 million users (mostly affiliate commissions, not subscriptions). Free banking apps cannibalize paid apps.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better UX, specific audiences (couples, parents, freelancers), novel approaches. Every budgeting method already has 10+ apps. When Mint (20M users, Intuit backing) couldn't make budgeting profitable and shut down, new entrants face worse odds.

  What to do instead:

  Build financial tools for specific industries or underserved populations. Expense management for healthcare with HIPAA compliance, financial tools for minority-owned businesses integrating with alternative lenders, cash flow management for seasonal businesses. Focus on B2B where businesses pay $100-500/month.

  Sources: Business Wire, PYMNTS

• 11. Task Management and To-Do List Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 300 task apps compete. Todoist, Microsoft To Do, Google Tasks, Apple Reminders, Any.do dominate. Apple and Google bundle free apps into every iOS and Android device (2 billion+ users). Microsoft bundles To Do with Office 365 (350+ million users). Retention drops below 15% after 30 days.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Productivity is $50+ billion software market. 81% use to-do lists. Complaints about tools (too complex, too simple, wrong workflow) suggest opportunity. But people complain about task apps like gyms: the problem isn't tool quality but user behavior.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific methods (GTD, Pomodoro, time blocking), target audiences (ADHD, parents), better integrations. Todoist offers every methodology with 30+ million users. Our market clarity reports show "task management for X audience" apps face identical retention problems because the issue is maintaining habits, not features.

  What to do instead:

  Build task management for industries with complex workflows requiring specialized features. Legal practices with court date tracking and trust accounting, healthcare with HIPAA-compliant patient tasks, construction with permit tracking. These pay $100-500/user monthly.

  Sources: Todoist Blog, Statista

• 12. Note-Taking and Knowledge Management Apps

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 50 major apps compete. Notion, Evernote, OneNote, Apple Notes, Google Keep, Obsidian control 70%+ share. Notion hit $10 billion valuation with 30+ million users. Microsoft bundles OneNote free with Office 365. Evernote sold for $500-700 million (down from $1B+ peak).

  Why it appears underserved:

  Knowledge workers create notes constantly. Personal knowledge management is $50+ billion category. Notion's $10B valuation suggests huge demand. Complaints about tools (Notion too complex, Evernote slow, Apple Notes basic) imply room for better. But these reflect different use cases, not gaps.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific workflows (Zettelkasten, PARA, networked notes), unique features (bidirectional links, graph views), target audiences. Notion adds features quarterly. Obsidian dominates linked notes with 1M+ users. When free options serve 90% adequately and Notion serves power users, no positioning remains viable.

  What to do instead:

  Build note-taking for specific professional workflows with compliance. Clinical notes for healthcare with HIPAA and EHR integration, legal notes with attorney-client privilege protection, construction notes with photo documentation and RFI tracking. These pay $50-200/user monthly.

  Sources: Business Insider, TechCrunch

• 13. Email Marketing Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 300 platforms compete. Mailchimp, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Constant Contact, SendGrid dominate 60%+ share. Mailchimp sold for $12 billion. Klaviyo went public at $9 billion but stock dropped 40%. Funding fell from $13.2 billion to $1.9 billion (86% decline). Customer acquisition costs hit $5,000-15,000 per B2B customer.

  Why it appears profitable:

  Email marketing is $10+ billion growing at 12% annually. Businesses spend $300-3,000/month. Email ROI averages $36-42 per $1 spent. Klaviyo generated $600+ million revenue. But new entrants face impossible economics. Mailchimp spent $500M+ on brand over 20 years.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Vertical focus (email for real estate, fitness), better deliverability, superior features. Klaviyo dominates e-commerce with purpose-built features. Mailchimp serves small businesses comprehensively. HubSpot owns mid-market through bundling. Top players spend $50-100M annually on R&D.

  What to do instead:

  Build infrastructure that enhances existing platforms. Advanced deliverability services for high-volume senders, template builders for specific industries, tools integrating email with niche CRMs. Focus on regulated industries: healthcare email with HIPAA compliance, financial services with SEC disclosures. These pay $500-2,000/month.

  Sources: Klaviyo Investor Relations, Crunchbase

• 14. Social Media Management Tools

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 200 platforms compete. Hootsuite, Sprout Social, Buffer, Later, Meta Business Suite dominate 65%+ share. Hootsuite raised $250+ million but couldn't achieve profitability. Sprout trades at $1.5 billion (down from $3B+ peak). Meta offers free scheduling and analytics directly. TikTok and LinkedIn added native scheduling.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Businesses manage 7-10 social accounts. Social media marketing is $50+ billion globally. 93% of marketers use management tools. But high adoption at low prices ($50-200/month) means served but not lucrative. Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn offering free native tools makes basic features commodities.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific platforms (tools for TikTok, LinkedIn), better features (AI suggestions, automated posting), target audiences (agencies, creators, small businesses). Hootsuite supports all platforms with 35+ integrations. Platforms improve free native tools monthly.

  What to do instead:

  Build social tools for specific high-value use cases. Social listening for healthcare (HIPAA-compliant patient review responses), compliance tools for financial services (SEC-required archiving), influencer platforms for specific industries. These pay $500-2,000/month because generic tools create compliance risks.

  Sources: Statista, Gartner

• 15. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 500 CRMs compete. Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, Zoho, Pipedrive control 70%+ share. Salesforce alone generates $34+ billion annually. HubSpot reached $2.2 billion. Customer acquisition costs hit $5,000-25,000 per business. Switching costs favor incumbents (migrating data takes months).

  Why it appears profitable:

  CRM is $70+ billion growing at 13% annually. Businesses pay $1,200-10,000+ per user annually. 91% of companies with 10+ employees use CRM. Margins reach 70-80%. But profitability concentrates in top 5-10 while hundreds fight over remaining 30%. Salesforce spends $5+ billion annually on R&D.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Industry specialization (CRM for real estate, healthcare, construction), better UX. Salesforce offers industry clouds for 15+ industries. HubSpot provides templates for 30+ industries. Building "CRM for X industry" means competing with Salesforce Industry Clouds backed by billions.

  What to do instead:

  Build specialized tools integrating with existing CRMs. Salesforce apps for ultra-specific use cases (trust accounting for legal, HIPAA patient portals for healthcare), HubSpot integrations for niche workflows. Salesforce AppExchange has 7,000+ apps generating $6+ billion in partner revenue annually.

  Sources: Salesforce Investor Relations, HubSpot Investor Relations

• 16. Video Conferencing and Remote Collaboration Tools

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex dominate 85%+ share. Zoom hit 300+ million daily participants and $4.4 billion revenue. Microsoft bundles Teams free with Office 365 (350+ million users). Google bundles Meet with Workspace (3+ billion users). Dozens of funded competitors raised millions but couldn't scale against free bundled options.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Remote work affects 1.2 billion+ workers globally. Market projects growth from $7 billion to $13.8 billion by 2030. Complaints about Zoom fatigue suggest room for better experiences. But improvements (virtual backgrounds, reactions) get commoditized within months as platforms add identical features quarterly.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Specific use cases (video for education, healthcare, sales), better features (spatial audio, virtual offices), improved UX (no downloads, browser-based). Zoom added waiting rooms, breakout rooms, recording. Teams integrated with Microsoft ecosystem. Meet works seamlessly with Calendar and Gmail.

  What to do instead:

  Build video for specific regulated industries. Telehealth platforms with HIPAA compliance and EHR integration ($150-500/provider monthly), legal depositions with court reporter integration ($500-2,000/case), remote patient monitoring combining video with biometric data. Focus on use cases where compliance creates defensibility.

  Sources: Zoom Investor Relations, Grand View Research

• 17. E-commerce Platform Builders (Shopify Competitors)

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Shopify dominates with 4.4+ million stores, $7.1 billion revenue, 32% market share. WooCommerce powers 6.5+ million sites. Wix has 243 million users. Network effects favor incumbents: Shopify has 13,000+ apps, 100,000+ themes. Customer acquisition costs hit $300-1,500 per merchant.

  Why it appears profitable:

  E-commerce is $5.7 trillion growing at 15% annually. Platform fees generate 20-30% margins. Small merchants pay $29-299/month plus transaction fees. But profitability concentrates in top 3-5 while hundreds fight over 20% remaining. Shopify reached profitability only after 14 years and $100M+ losses.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Vertical focus (e-commerce for industries), better features (faster checkout, easier product management), improved pricing. Shopify adds industry features quarterly with dedicated verticals. WooCommerce offers unlimited free customization. Wix improves with $500M annual development budget.

  What to do instead:

  Build Shopify apps rather than competing. Specialized apps for industries (wine compliance and age verification, medical devices with FDA compliance). The app ecosystem generates $500M+ partner revenue annually from merchants willing to spend $10-300/month per app. Our market clarity reports on Shopify apps show specialized apps serving niche needs consistently outperform general tools.

  Sources: Shopify Investor Relations, Statista

• 18. Password Managers and Security Tools

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  1Password, LastPass, Bitwarden, Dashlane, and browser password managers dominate 80%+ share. Apple, Google, Microsoft bundle password management into operating systems billions use. LastPass suffered major breach in 2022. 1Password raised at $6.8 billion valuation but faces commoditization as browsers improve.

  Why it appears underserved:

  83% reuse passwords across sites. Password security is critical cybersecurity need. Businesses pay $5-15 per employee monthly. Market projects growth from $2.2 billion to $5.8 billion by 2030. But growth comes from enterprises adopting existing tools, not new entrants winning share.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better security, improved UX, specific features (passwordless authentication, biometric verification). 1Password offers all major features with strong security. Browsers improve built-in managers with zero friction. Bitwarden provides enterprise-grade security as free open-source.

  What to do instead:

  Build identity and access management for industries with complex compliance. IAM for healthcare with HIPAA and role-based EHR access, security for financial services with SOC 2 and audit logging, privileged access for government contractors with CMMC compliance. These command $10-50 per employee monthly.

  Sources: Statista, Bitwarden Security Report

• 19. Invoicing and Accounting Software for Small Businesses

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Over 300 platforms compete. QuickBooks, Xero, FreshBooks, Wave, Zoho Books control 70%+ share. QuickBooks has 7.1+ million users and $5.6+ billion revenue. Xero serves 3.5+ million subscribers. Wave offers completely free invoicing, accounting, receipt scanning. Customer acquisition costs hit $500-2,000 per business.

  Why it appears profitable:

  33 million small businesses in US alone. Accounting sees 90%+ retention because switching requires migrating years of financial data. Businesses pay $30-150/month plus payroll and payment fees. But profitability concentrates in top players. QuickBooks dominates through accountant referrals (650,000+ professionals recommend it).

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Industry specialization (accounting for contractors, restaurants, agencies), better UX (simpler interface, mobile-first), improved pricing. QuickBooks offers industry versions for 20+ industries. Wave provides completely free invoicing with acceptable UX. Accountant recommendations drive 70%+ of new acquisition.

  What to do instead:

  Build financial tools for industries with complex compliance generic software doesn't handle. Cannabis businesses (tax compliance under 280E, seed-to-sale tracking), nonprofit accounting with fund accounting and grant management, construction with job costing and lien waivers. These command $100-500/month because errors create legal risk.

  Sources: Intuit Investor Relations, Xero About


Our market clarity reports track signals from forums and discussions. Whenever your audience reacts strongly to something, we capture and classify it, making sure you focus on what your market truly needs.

• 20. Payment Processing and Fintech

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Fintech funding declined 50% to $39.2 billion in 2023, then another 20% to $33.7 billion in 2024. Stripe, PayPal, Square, Adyen, Checkout.com control 60%+ payment processing. Stripe hit $14+ billion revenue and $50 billion valuation but faces increasing competition from banks offering embedded payments.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Global payments are $2.2+ trillion growing at 14% annually. Payment processing generates 2-3% of transaction value with minimal marginal costs. 93% of fintechs find compliance challenging, suggesting barriers. But these barriers also block new entrants: PCI compliance, AML requirements, state licenses create $5-20M minimum costs before processing first transaction.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Industry specialization (payments for verticals), better rates, improved features (faster settlements, fraud protection). Stripe serves 100+ countries with optimized checkout. Square offers hardware and software integrated for retail. PayPal provides payment options with 430+ million accounts.

  What to do instead:

  Build payment infrastructure serving underserved populations or B2B2C models. Focus on embedded finance enabling vertical SaaS to offer payments (platforms derive 50%+ revenue from embedded payments). Target high-risk industries Stripe/Square reject (CBD, adult, gambling, crypto). Target 1.7 billion unbanked adults with mobile wallets. Our market clarity reports on payment processing show specialized solutions for underserved markets outperform generic processors.

  Sources: McKinsey Global Payments Report, CB Insights

• 21. Cryptocurrency Exchanges and Web3 Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Web3 funding collapsed from $33 billion in 2021 to under $1 billion quarterly by late 2023 (82% decline). Coinbase, Binance, Kraken dominate exchanges with 70%+ share. FTX destroyed $32 billion and triggered massive regulatory scrutiny. Most Web3 projects face 95%+ user churn.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Crypto adoption continues with 560+ million users globally. DeFi represents innovation opportunity. NFT markets, DAOs, blockchain gaming suggest new use cases. But 95% of activity is speculation, not utility: 95% of NFT projects have zero value, 97% of blockchain games have under 1,000 monthly users.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better UX, specific use cases (Web3 social media, decentralized storage, blockchain gaming), solving crypto's problems (easier onboarding, better security). Coinbase offers intuitive interfaces. OpenSea dominates NFTs despite 95% value collapse. Billions in blockchain gaming produced no mainstream hits.

  What to do instead:

  If pursuing crypto, focus on infrastructure and compliance tools for existing businesses. Tax reporting for crypto traders (massively complex), compliance platforms for institutions offering crypto, custody solutions for wealth management, blockchain analytics for law enforcement. These B2B tools serve businesses operating in crypto regardless of consumer adoption, command $10,000-100,000+ annually.

  Sources: The Block, Galaxy Digital

• 22. Creator Economy Platforms and Tools

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  Creator funding dropped over 90% from $939 million in 2021 to minimal levels by Q2 2023. Patreon, Substack, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram dominate monetization with 80%+ share. Platform consolidation intensified: YouTube added shopping, subscriptions, tipping; Instagram launched paid subscriptions.

  Why it appears underserved:

  50+ million creators globally seek monetization. Creator economy projected to reach $104 billion. Average creator earns under $500/month, suggesting opportunity for better tools. But low earnings isn't a product problem. 99.9% of creators earn almost nothing because audiences concentrate around top 0.1%.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Better discovery platforms, community tools, subscription services, creator marketplaces. YouTube offers subscriptions, memberships, Super Chat. Instagram provides badges and subscriptions. TikTok launched creator funds and shopping. When platforms bundle monetization free, standalone tools face impossible value proposition.

  What to do instead:

  Build creator tools for specific industries with complex requirements. Influencer marketing for B2B industries (software, manufacturing), creator collaboration for agencies managing 50+ influencers. Focus on B2B creator services: tools helping brands find and manage influencers at scale ($5,000-50,000+ monthly), platforms enabling agencies to coordinate campaigns.

  Sources: SignalFire Creator Economy, Goldman Sachs

• 23. Food Delivery and Ghost Kitchen Platforms

  What makes us think it will be overcrowded:

  DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub control 90%+ US market. DoorDash alone has 67% share and $8.6 billion revenue but operates at minimal profitability despite massive scale. Ghost kitchen funding collapsed 85% from 2021. Restaurant commission rates (20-30%) create unsustainable economics where restaurants lose money on delivery orders.

  Why it appears underserved:

  Food delivery is $200+ billion growing at 12% annually. Only 15% of restaurant orders come through delivery, suggesting expansion. But food delivery is structurally unprofitable: delivery costs $5-8 per order, restaurants need 18-25% margins to survive, consumers won't pay $20+ for $10 meals. DoorDash loses money despite 67% share and massive scale.

  Why people think it's still a good idea and why they're wrong:

  Vertical focus (delivery for specific cuisines or neighborhoods), better unit economics (autonomous delivery, centralized kitchens), improved restaurant terms. DoorDash operates at scale with sophisticated logistics and barely breaks even. Uber subsidizes food delivery with rideshare profits. Autonomous delivery remains years away.

  What to do instead:

  Exit food delivery entirely because unit economics don't work. Focus on B2B food service tools. Restaurant operating systems (POS, inventory, staff management) integrating with delivery platforms, food safety and compliance software, supplier management connecting restaurants with wholesalers. Restaurants pay $100-500/month for software improving margins.

  Sources: DoorDash Investor Relations, Second Measure

We have market clarity reports for more than 100 products. Find yours now.