How to Make Money with AI?

We research AI Wrappers every day, if you're building in this space, get our report

The real money in AI flows to infrastructure players like NVIDIA, not model developers burning billions despite massive revenues.

Meanwhile, new model capabilities from GPT-5, Gemini 2.5, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 are making 90% of AI wrappers obsolete within 18 months.

This creates a landscape where selling shovels beats digging for gold, but the real fortunes will come from applications leveraging long-context windows and autonomous agents.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the real user pain points that don't yet have good solutions, so you can build what people want.

Where is the real money in the artificial intelligence value chain right now?

The real and interesting money in the AI field is actually concentrated at the infrastructure layer, not where most people think.

NVIDIA absolutely dominates with nearly $73B in annual profit at 56% net margins, which is unheard of in tech. To put that in context, they make more profit than most Fortune 500 companies make in revenue. Their Q4 data center revenue alone hit $36B, growing 93% year-over-year while controlling roughly 80-98% of the AI GPU market.

Cloud providers are profitable too, but they're in a different game entirely.

AWS pulls in about $10B quarterly operating income at 33% margins, while Azure grows faster at 39% annually. Here's the striking part: the Big 3 collectively spent $240B on AI infrastructure in 2025 but only generated $25-30B in direct AI revenue. That's spending $8-10 to earn $1, showing we're in a massive buildout phase where infrastructure investment far outpaces monetization.

Model developers present the opposite picture despite their visibility. OpenAI hit nearly $4B revenue in 2024 but lost $5B doing it, meaning they burned through $1.25 for every $1 earned. Anthropic reached $1B revenue with nearly $6B in cash burn, losing $6 for every $1 earned. The unit economics simply don't work yet for these companies.

Application layer companies are showing the most promising path forward though. Cursor generates $500M revenue at $3.2M per employee, which is roughly double what Microsoft makes per employee. The AI agent market itself jumped from $5B in 2024 to $13B in 2025, more than doubling in one year and proving applications can monetize better than models.

So the uncomfortable truth is that real money flows to infrastructure sellers right now, not model builders or simple wrappers.

What is the easiest and fastest way to make money with artificial intelligence in 2026?

The fastest path to making real money with AI in 2026 is actually AI implementation consulting, not building AI products.

You can charge $5,000-$10,000 monthly per client at 70-80% profit margins, which beats almost any other business model. AI Acquisition Network members average about $19,000 monthly, reaching first dollar in 1-3 months and hitting $10,000 monthly revenue in 6-12 months with just 1-2 clients. That means you're potentially making six figures within your first year.

The opportunity exists because 94% of businesses want AI but have no idea how to implement it.

They need someone to connect existing tools like ChatGPT or Claude to their actual workflows. You're not building anything new here, you're just showing them how to use what already exists, which is why the speed to money is so fast compared to building a product.

Training services can work even faster if you have expertise to package. The Side School launched an AI bootcamp and hit six figures in three months, charging $1,400 per person for one-month programs. At 350 students, that's nearly $500,000 per cohort, which they can run multiple times per year.

Micro-SaaS shows crazy asymmetric upside for those willing to build. Mockey.ai reached $12,000 MRR just 11 months after going paid, which is $144,000 annually. Chatbase hit $5M ARR within two years. Subscribr got to $10,000 MRR ($120,000 annually) in 100 days.

We're covering dozens of these strategies with real founder interviews in our market research report about AI Wrappers.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you which areas are already overcrowded, so you don't waste time or effort.

What AI business ideas are still viable in 2026 that you can start with no budget?

The most viable no-budget AI business in 2026 is AI-enhanced freelancing, which needs nothing but a free ChatGPT account and internet.

You start at $15-$30 hourly (about what baristas make) then scale to $50-$100 hourly within six months (roughly what junior developers make). The math to $5,000 monthly is simple: just 20 hours weekly at $50 hourly, which most people hit in 4-6 months. That's a livable income in most U.S. cities from work you can do anywhere.

YouTube automation builds passive income using entirely free software if you're willing to grind content.

ChatGPT writes your scripts, Canva creates thumbnails, CapCut edits video, and ElevenLabs handles voiceovers, all using free tiers. The trick is picking high-CPM niches like finance ($7-15 per 1,000 views) instead of gaming ($2-3 per 1,000 views), which can triple your earnings from the same number of views.

Digital products convert your knowledge into recurring revenue with zero investment. Easlo made $300,000 in one year selling Notion templates on Gumroad and Etsy, pricing products at $10-$50 each. That's selling 6,000-30,000 templates, which sounds like a lot until you realize digital products have zero marginal cost, meaning each sale is nearly pure profit.

No-code micro-SaaS uses free tools like Bubble.io, Zapier, and OpenAI API (which starts with $5 credit). One founder invested just $1,000 and hit $100,000 MRR in nine months building an e-commerce analytics tool. At that rate, they made back their initial investment in about 3 days.

What are new artificial intelligence opportunities in 2026 that didn't exist in 2025?

The biggest new opportunity in 2026 is multi-day autonomous coding agents, which fundamentally changes software economics.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 can now run 30+ hours straight without human help, roughly a full work week compressed into a weekend. It scores 77% on SWE-bench Verified, meaning it successfully completes about 3 out of 4 real-world coding tasks. You can literally assign complete features to AI on Friday night and wake up Monday to finished, production-ready code.

Native video generation with audio is creating entirely new media businesses at ridiculous cost reductions.

Sora 2 and Veo 3 deliver broadcast-quality output for about $0.10 per second, or $6 per minute. Compare that to traditional video production at $1,000-$10,000 daily for crews and equipment. A 5-minute video that used to cost $5,000-$50,000 now costs $30, making video production accessible to literally anyone.

Million-token context windows unlock applications that were literally impossible six months ago. Gemini 2.5 Pro handles 1 million tokens, which is roughly 750,000 words or about 10 full-length novels. This means you can now process an entire company's documentation, years of medical records, or complete legal case histories in a single prompt without chunking or retrieval.

Agentic AI is moving from concept to real production, which is where the massive market opportunity sits. 82% of organizations plan to integrate AI agents by 2026, but only 5% have actually done it, creating a 16x gap between intention and execution. The market jumps from roughly $5B in 2025 to $47B by 2030, nearly a 10x growth. Early movers are seeing 35% productivity gains, which on a $1M salary budget means saving $350,000 annually.

You'll find detailed breakdowns on capitalizing on these capabilities in our 200-page report covering everything you need to know about AI Wrappers.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you which ones are standing out and what strategies they implemented to be that successful, so you can replicate some of them.

What are non-obvious, lesser-known, and emerging artificial intelligence niches?

The most non-obvious opportunity is AI for field service businesses, which remains 99% unpenetrated despite massive potential.

Fire safety, HVAC, and commercial services still run on pen and paper even though millions of contractors exist globally. ServiceTitan is the category leader but barely touches 1% of the market, meaning 99 out of 100 potential customers haven't been reached yet. Revenue potential hits $50,000-$200,000+ annually per mid-sized company with over 90% retention, meaning once you land a client, they basically never leave.

Immigration law automation is another wide-open niche that's barely tapped.

Only 17 out of 100 immigration attorneys use AI tools in 2025 despite platforms delivering 70% faster visa drafting. The legal AI market grows from roughly $3B in 2025 to $11B by 2030, more than tripling. Pricing sits at $500-$2,000 monthly per attorney with 70% time savings, which means an attorney billing $300 hourly can recover 14-28 hours monthly, worth $4,200-$8,400 in billable time.

Ambient clinical documentation is exploding because it solves real physician burnout. The market grew 140% year-over-year (more than doubling) to $600M in 2025 revenue. Leaders like Nuance DAX Copilot and Abridge save 66 minutes per provider daily, which is over an hour. For a physician seeing patients 250 days yearly, that's 275 hours saved or nearly 7 work weeks recovered.

Construction site monitoring addresses safety and efficiency problems that cost billions annually. AI in construction grows from roughly $5B in 2025 to $23B by 2032, jumping about 4-5x. Safety applications specifically grow at 39% annually with $10,000-$100,000+ per project pricing, delivering 25-30% fewer safety incidents, which directly reduces workers' compensation insurance costs and lawsuits.

AI for accessibility serves 1.3 billion people today (roughly 1 in 6 humans) and expands to 3.5 billion by 2050 as populations age. The market grows from about $1.4B in 2024 to $13B by 2034, roughly 9x growth, with government and insurance reimbursement providing reliable payment sources instead of relying on consumer willingness to pay.

Which "boring" artificial intelligence applications have sustainable competitive advantages?

The most defensible boring AI applications are those that embed so deeply into operations that extraction becomes impossible.

UiPath dominates robotic process automation with roughly $1.3B revenue growing 24% annually in FY2024, hitting their first GAAP profitability as a public company. They achieve 87% gross margins (keeping $0.87 of every revenue dollar) with 119% dollar-based net retention (existing customers spend 19% more each year). But the real moat isn't the technology, it's organizational knowledge. Once UiPath runs your workflows, replacing it means rebuilding hundreds of automations that only your employees understand, representing years of institutional knowledge you can't easily replicate.

Celonis owns process mining with similar dynamics at play.

They hit roughly $770M revenue in 2023, growing 39% annually with 60% market share (meaning 3 out of 5 customers choose them) across 1,400+ customers. Their moat requires access to all your enterprise system data from ERP, CRM, and other platforms. Once Celonis integrates with your entire tech stack, competitors face two-year integration efforts to replicate what you've built, and no CFO wants to authorize that time and expense.

Workato dominates enterprise iPaaS by making themselves equally irreplaceable. Revenue grew from about $42M in 2020 to $150M in 2024 (3.6x growth in 4 years) across 11,000+ customers with 1,000+ pre-built connectors. Once Workato connects your mission-critical integrations running 24/7, switching costs become near-infinite because you'd have to rebuild your entire integration infrastructure, and one mistake means payroll doesn't run or orders don't process.

These boring applications win long-term because they're not flashy AI features but rather infrastructure that companies literally cannot operate without.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the real challenges upfront - the things that trip up most founders and drain their time, money, or motivation. We think it will be better than learning these painful lessons yourself.

Where will there be the biggest demand for artificial intelligence in the next 10 years?

The biggest demand over the next decade will be in cloud AI services, which are growing roughly 7x from about $87B today to $650B by 2030.

To put that in perspective, Goldman Sachs projects cloud services hitting $2 trillion total by 2030, with GenAI representing $200-300B of that. The U.S. market alone captures about one-third of this, meaning American companies will spend around $200B annually on cloud AI by 2030.

AI chips and infrastructure will grow even faster, jumping roughly 8-9x from about $53B today to $450B by 2030.

Data center AI chips alone will exceed $400B by 2030, which is roughly the size of the entire semiconductor industry today. GPUs maintain about half the market, and NVIDIA commands over 90% of the GenAI GPU market, which explains why they're printing money while everyone else struggles.

Healthcare AI will grow about 7x from roughly $27B today to $188B by 2030, which makes sense given aging populations. The U.S. healthcare system alone could save $150B yearly by 2026 through AI, meaning the technology literally pays for itself multiple times over. Over 500 FDA submissions already contain AI components, showing this isn't theoretical anymore.

Transportation and logistics show the craziest growth, jumping roughly 30x from about $12B in 2023 to $350B by 2032. E-commerce drives this because companies like Amazon need to deliver faster and cheaper. AI cuts their logistics costs 10-20%, which on tens of billions in spending means saving billions annually, making the ROI obvious.

Enterprise AI software will grow roughly 5x from about $97B in 2025 to $467B by 2030, with Gartner predicting one in three enterprise software products will include agentic AI by 2028.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you dozens of examples of great distribution strategies, with breakdowns you can copy.

How will LLMs evolve and what artificial intelligence ideas will they make obsolete?

LLMs are evolving toward massive price collapses while tripling capabilities, which kills anyone just arbitraging API access.

GPT-5 pricing hit about $1.25 per million input tokens, an 80%+ reduction versus GPT-4 at launch. To put that in perspective, analyzing a 200-page book (about 150,000 words or 200,000 tokens) now costs $0.25 instead of $1.25. OpenAI prices overall dropped 66% (cut by two-thirds) since 2020. ChatGPT's own operating costs fell 90% in just three months from December 2022 to March 2023, meaning costs are dropping faster than prices.

Simple RAG systems face existential threats as context windows expand to hold entire books.

Why retrieve chunks from vector databases when you can fit 1 million-10 million tokens (roughly 10-100 full novels) in context? The reality is RAG evolves rather than disappears completely. Optimal strategies will combine retrieval with long context for precision and cost, but many current RAG use cases become unnecessary when you can just paste everything directly.

Prompt engineering as a standalone skill has already disappeared from the labor market. Wall Street Journal called it the hottest AI job of 2023, but job searches dropped from 144 per million in April 2023 to 20-30 now (about an 80% decline). Models getting smarter means they need less hand-holding, making the skill obsolete.

AI wrapper businesses face mass extinction with 90% (9 out of 10) failing within their first year. 966 shutdowns occurred in 2024, up 25.6% from 2023, suggesting 2025 will see 1,200+ failures. Some analysts predict 99% (essentially all) will be dead by 2026 because they have no moat, face margin compression as prices drop 50-80% annually, and offer zero switching costs when users realize they can just use ChatGPT directly.

New opportunities emerge from these improvements though: long-context applications (analyzing entire company documentation in one prompt), autonomous agents (Claude working 30+ hours without supervision, Gartner predicts 80% of support tickets resolved without humans by 2029), multimodal applications (generating broadcast-quality video from text prompts), and healthcare breakthroughs (AI reading entire patient histories to suggest diagnoses).

We're documenting which wrappers survived multiple LLM updates and how in our market clarity report covering AI Wrappers.

Which artificial intelligence business ideas look good but actually almost always fail?

AI wrapper apps look attractive but fail at a 90% rate (9 out of 10) because the underlying economics simply don't work.

Wrappers typically charge $60 monthly but their costs approach $4 in API expenses, leaving $56 profit per user. Sounds good until OpenAI drops prices 50%, cutting your margin from $56 to $28 overnight with zero warning. Anyone can replicate wrapper functionality in five minutes for under $4 versus paying $50-100 monthly, which makes building a defensible business nearly impossible when your only moat is convenience.

Generic AI chatbots face commoditization despite seeming like an obvious opportunity.

45% of U.S. adults (nearly half) find chatbots unfavorable, up from 43% in 2022, showing consumer sentiment is actually declining not improving. With thousands of providers offering similar performance, products become interchangeable commodities competing purely on price with no brand loyalty, meaning you're racing to zero profit.

Consumer AI hardware consistently fails because it solves problems that don't actually exist. Humane AI Pin ($700) and Rabbit R1 ($200) both tried selling dedicated hardware to do what smartphone apps already handle perfectly for free. They joined the graveyard with Anki ($200M raised, shut down 2019) and Jibo (shut down 2018), proving this model doesn't work.

Poor technical execution kills startups even when benchmarks look impressive. LegalMind achieved 94.7% accuracy (roughly 19 out of 20 correct) on Stanford tests but lawyers still wouldn't trust black-box decisions for real cases where one mistake means malpractice lawsuits. Technical performance doesn't automatically translate to market success when trust and explainability matter more than raw accuracy.

Financial instability kills 16% (roughly 1 in 6) AI startups because development costs are brutal regardless of revenue. Data scientists cost $150,000-$300,000 annually per person, compute expenses run $10,000-$100,000+ monthly, and VC funding dropped 42% from $381B in 2022 to $221B in 2023, meaning less money is chasing the same number of startups.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the best conversion tactics with real examples. Then, you can replicate the frameworks that are already working instead of spending months testing what converts.

What former good artificial intelligence ideas are now overcrowded and commoditized?

AI writing tools have become completely saturated with 20+ major competitors fighting for the same users.

Jasper, Writesonic, Copy.ai and dozens more compete while 87% of marketers (nearly 9 out of 10) already use AI for content creation. Pricing ranges from $9-$60 monthly with free alternatives like ChatGPT available. Users get similar results with raw ChatGPT, eliminating any reason to pay $20-60 monthly for a wrapper that does the same thing.

AI image generation shows brutal price compression despite overall market growth.

The market grows from about $9B in 2024 to $61B by 2030 (roughly 7x growth), but generic generators are already saturated with falling prices and reduced differentiation. DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Google Imagen, and Adobe Firefly all compete at $10-$120 monthly or completely free with open-source options, meaning profit margins compress toward zero.

AI customer service chatbots face commoditization that makes differentiation nearly impossible.

The market grows from about $6B in 2023 to $27B by 2030 (roughly 4.5x growth), but generic chatbots deliver similar performance across all platforms. Brand loyalty weakens as consumer sentiment shows 45% (nearly half) find chatbots unfavorable, up from 43% in 2022. This means the market is growing while customers actively dislike the products, suggesting growth is from corporate mandates rather than user demand.

GPT wrappers generally face structural unsustainability with predictions that 99% (essentially all) will be dead by 2026. Most "AI-powered" tools are just interfaces wrapped around OpenAI's API at $60 monthly subscriptions when users can access the same API directly for $5-20 monthly. You're building on rented land controlled by companies actively trying to cut you out, and you're one OpenAI feature update away from complete obsolescence.

DeepSeek triggered a commoditization crisis by training competitive models for roughly $6M versus $100M+ for GPT-4 (a 95%+ cost reduction). Open-source models now make quality AI available at almost no cost with switching costs approaching zero, destroying any pricing power wrappers once had when models were expensive and scarce.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the ones that have survived multiple waves of LLM updates. Then, you can build similar moats.

Which current good artificial intelligence businesses might decline in the next 10 years?

Model API businesses face a commoditization trap as models become increasingly similar and interchangeable.

Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns models are becoming commodities where "models by themselves are not sufficient" for competitive advantage. AWS Bedrock demonstrates this by letting customers switch between competing models with relative ease, like changing gas stations. OpenAI's token pricing already dropped 80%+ (cut by four-fifths) from 2023 to 2024, with 2-5 years projected for significant margin compression and 5-10 years for potential market exit of pure-play API providers who can't differentiate on anything but price.

Vector databases face existential threats as context windows expand to handle entire document libraries.

Why retrieve chunks when you can fit 1 million-10 million tokens (roughly 750,000-7.5 million words or 3,000-30,000 pages) in context? The market likely shrinks 40-60% over 3-7 years as long-context reduces specific use cases. Cost and precision arguments provide some defense, but many current applications become unnecessary when you can just paste everything directly instead of building complex retrieval systems.

Data annotation services face synthetic data replacement that makes human annotation economically unviable. Gartner predicts synthetic data will surpass real data by 2030, meaning more than half of training data will be AI-generated. 70% (7 out of 10) enterprises will use synthetic data by 2025. LLMs now pre-annotate text and generate labels themselves, creating irresistible economic pressure since synthetic data avoids all collection and processing costs that can run $50-$500 per hour for human annotators.

AI infrastructure faces overcapacity risk reminiscent of the 1990s dot-com crash when 85-95% of laid fiber remained unused for years.

Today's numbers show $560B infrastructure spend over two years generating only $35B in AI revenue combined, a ratio of roughly $16 spent for every $1 earned. Smaller GPU-as-a-service startups face shakeout in 3-5 years as this overcapacity becomes obvious and pricing collapses from oversupply, similar to how Bitcoin mining became unprofitable for small operators.

First-generation AI apps face disruption from better-funded second-generation startups that benefit from superior models (GPT-5 vs GPT-3.5), learned mistakes from watching failures, and dramatically lower API costs (80%+ reductions). McKinsey warns "software focused on ad hoc data querying will likely see disruption as GenAI supplants them" within 2-4 years, meaning early movers without strong defensibility get displaced quickly by fast followers with better economics.

We break down which moats actually protect against these threats in our report to build a profitable AI Wrapper.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you what successful wrappers implemented to lock in users. Small tweaks that (we think) make a massive difference in retention numbers.