42 Content Ideas to Rank on ChatGPT

We research digital businesses every day, if you're building in this space, get our market clarity reports

ChatGPT doesn't rank content the same way Google does, and that changes everything about what actually gets surfaced.

When someone asks ChatGPT a question, the model searches through its training data looking for patterns that match the query, which means the content that wins isn't necessarily the most linked or the most optimized for keywords.

If you want your content to show up in ChatGPT responses, you need to understand what makes LLMs pull certain pieces over others (and our market clarity reports show exactly which content formats dominate in your specific market).

What kind of content ranks on ChatGPT?

• 1. Step-by-step tutorials with numbered instructions

  ChatGPT's architecture is built to recognize sequential patterns, which makes numbered steps incredibly easy for the model to extract and reproduce when answering "how to" questions. The transformer attention mechanism can map relationships between steps, making it simple to pull out just the relevant parts or the entire sequence depending on what the user asks. This works best when each step includes a clear action verb and expected outcome, but it loses effectiveness if your steps are vague or skip critical details.

• 2. Comparison tables with consistent column structures

  LLMs process tabular data by converting it into token sequences where column headers act as semantic anchors, making it extremely efficient to extract and compare features across different options. The model can quickly identify patterns like "Product A costs X while Product B costs Y" because the structured format creates predictable token relationships. Tables fail to rank when they're presented as images or PDFs instead of actual HTML tables, since the model can't parse visual information during training.

• 3. Problem-solution frameworks with explicit pain points

  ChatGPT excels at matching user queries to content that explicitly states problems and their solutions because the model's training objective involves predicting the next token in sequences like "problem → solution." When your content follows the pattern "here's the issue, here's why it happens, here's how to fix it," the causal relationships are encoded directly in the attention weights. This approach stops working when you bury the problem or solution in metaphors or abstract language that breaks the semantic connection.

• 4. Listicles with descriptive subheadings for each point

  List-based content creates distinct semantic clusters that the model can independently access, meaning ChatGPT can pull out point #7 without needing to process the entire article. The transformer's self-attention mechanism treats each list item as a separate information unit, making it easier to match specific items to specific queries. Lists underperform when every item sounds the same or when the descriptions are too short to provide meaningful context.

• 5. Case studies with quantified results and timelines

  Numbers and dates create strong token patterns that LLMs can easily identify and extract, especially when they're connected to outcomes like "increased revenue by 40% in 3 months." The model's training on massive datasets means it has seen thousands of similar before-after patterns, making it particularly good at recognizing causal narratives with metrics. Case studies lose their ranking power when they're written like stories without clear data points or when the methodology isn't explained.

• 6. FAQ pages with direct question-answer pairs

  The question-answer format mirrors how ChatGPT itself operates, making it incredibly natural for the model to map user queries directly to your FAQ answers. The model's bidirectional context understanding means it can see both the question and answer together, creating strong associations that surface when similar questions are asked. FAQs fail when questions are phrased in unnatural ways that real users would never type, or when answers are too brief to be useful.

• 7. Definition articles with multiple examples per concept

  LLMs learn concepts through exposure to varied contexts, so definition articles that include 3-5 different examples help the model build a more robust understanding of what you're explaining. The attention mechanism weights connect your definition to each example, creating multiple pathways for the model to retrieve that information. This approach breaks down when examples are too similar or when the definition itself is circular or relies on undefined terms.

• 8. Checklist content with yes/no decision points

  Binary decision structures are computationally efficient for LLMs because they create clear branching paths in the model's internal representation of your content. The transformer can easily follow "if yes, then X; if no, then Y" logic because this matches the conditional patterns it has seen across millions of training examples. Checklists stop being useful when they're too generic or when the decision points require information the user doesn't have access to.

• 9. Best practices lists with reasoning for each practice

  When you explain why something is a best practice, you create causal token relationships that the model can use to answer not just "what are the best practices" but also "why should I do this." The model's ability to understand context means it can pull out the reasoning separately from the practice itself, making your content useful for multiple query types. This format fails when you list practices without justification or when your reasoning is based on outdated assumptions.



We have market clarity reports for more than 100 products — find yours now.

• 10. Tool reviews with structured pros and cons sections

  The pros/cons format creates opposing semantic vectors that the model can easily distinguish, making it simple to answer queries like "what are the downsides of X." The contrastive structure helps the model understand trade-offs because it has been trained on millions of similar evaluative texts. Reviews lose ranking power when pros and cons are opinion-based rather than feature-based, or when they don't specify the use case.

• 11. Process breakdowns with input-output specifications

  LLMs excel at understanding transformational processes where you specify what goes in and what comes out, because this matches fundamental patterns in language like "X becomes Y." The model can trace the causal chain through your process breakdown, making it easy to answer questions about intermediate steps or final outcomes. This stops working when you skip steps or when the inputs/outputs aren't clearly defined.

• 12. Framework explanations with visual structure descriptions

  Even though LLMs don't "see" images during training, describing the visual structure of frameworks (like "imagine a 2x2 matrix with...") creates spatial relationships in the token space. The model can understand hierarchies, groupings, and relationships when you explicitly state them, and the positional encoding helps maintain these structural relationships. Frameworks fail to rank when you assume readers can see your diagram without describing it textually.

• 13. Statistics compilations with source citations for each number

  ChatGPT was trained to recognize patterns where numbers are followed by sources, which makes properly cited statistics much more likely to be surfaced than unsourced claims. The model's understanding of evidential reasoning means it prefers content that shows where data comes from, especially for queries that require authoritative answers. Statistics lose credibility in the model when they're presented without context or when the citation is generic like "according to studies."

• 14. Expert quote compilations with credential mentions

  The pattern of "Name, Title at Company, says..." creates strong authority signals in the model's training, making expert quotes more likely to be cited than anonymous advice. The transformer's ability to understand entity relationships means it associates the expertise (credentials) with the statement, increasing the weight given to that information. Quotes fail when credentials aren't mentioned or when the expert isn't recognizable in the training data.

• 15. Beginner's guides with prerequisite knowledge clearly stated

  When you explicitly state "you need to know X before Y," you help the model understand the learning sequence and can better match your content to users at different knowledge levels. The model's contextual understanding allows it to recognize when content is introductory versus advanced, making it more likely to surface beginner content for basic queries. This breaks down when you use jargon without defining it or when you assume knowledge without stating those assumptions.

• 16. Advanced deep-dives with clear scope statements

  Starting with "this guide assumes you already know..." helps the model classify content difficulty and match it to appropriate queries, especially when users ask for "advanced" or "detailed" information. The transformer can recognize technical depth signals like specialized terminology, complex examples, and nuanced explanations. Deep-dives underperform when they're too narrow or when the advanced concepts aren't connected to practical applications.

• 17. Common mistakes articles with corrective actions

  The "mistake → correction" pattern is extremely common in the training data, making this format highly recognizable for LLMs and easy to extract and recombine. The model can answer both "what mistakes should I avoid" and "how do I fix this mistake" from the same content because the bidirectional attention links the problem to the solution. This format stops working when corrections are vague or when you don't explain why something is a mistake.

• 18. Tips and tricks lists with specific scenarios

  Context-specific tips create conditional knowledge that the model can access based on user query details, like "tip for small teams" versus "tip for enterprises." The transformer's attention mechanism can recognize when your tip applies to a specific situation and surface it accordingly. Tips lose value when they're too generic ("work harder") or when the scenario isn't clearly defined.

• 19. Resource roundups with annotation for each resource

  Simply listing resources isn't enough, but adding descriptive annotations like "best for beginners" or "focuses on technical implementation" helps the model understand the relevance of each item. The model can then match resource characteristics to user needs, making your roundup useful for multiple different queries. Roundups fail when they're just links without context or when every resource is described identically.



Our market clarity reports contain between 100 and 300 insights about your market.

• 20. Timeline or chronological explainers with date markers

  Temporal sequences help LLMs understand causality and evolution, especially when dates or time periods are explicitly mentioned in each phase. The model's positional encoding combined with explicit temporal markers makes it easy to extract information about specific time periods or trace how something developed. Timelines underperform when dates are missing or when the causal connections between events aren't explained.

• 21. Before-after comparisons with specific metrics

  Quantified transformations create clear delta patterns that the model associates with success stories and proof points. The structure "was X, now is Y" with numbers creates strong semantic relationships that make your content easy to cite when users ask about results or outcomes. This format loses impact when comparisons are qualitative only or when you don't specify the timeframe or method.

• 22. Troubleshooting guides with symptom-cause-solution structure

  The diagnostic format matches how users actually query ChatGPT ("I'm experiencing X, what's wrong?"), making it highly likely the model will map symptoms to your solutions. The three-part structure creates clear causal chains that the transformer can follow from problem identification to resolution. Troubleshooting guides fail when symptoms are too broadly described or when multiple causes aren't distinguished.

• 23. Myth-busting articles with evidence for each correction

  The "common belief → reality" pattern creates contrastive learning opportunities for the model, making it easy to answer "is X true" questions. The model's training includes countless fact-checking patterns, so content that explicitly labels myths and provides evidence-based corrections gets weighted heavily. This approach fails when you don't explain why the myth persists or when your "reality" lacks supporting evidence.

• 24. Cost breakdowns with itemized pricing components

  Detailed pricing structures help the model answer specific cost-related queries like "how much does X cost" or "what's included in the price." The itemized format creates additive patterns that the transformer can easily parse and recombine based on what the user asks. Cost breakdowns lose utility when they're presented as ranges without explanation or when they don't specify what's included.

• 25. Feature comparison matrices with capability ratings

  Multi-dimensional comparisons create rich semantic spaces where the model can evaluate trade-offs across different criteria simultaneously. The transformer's attention mechanism can weigh different features based on the user's query context, making your comparison useful for varied decision-making scenarios. Matrices fail when they're too sparse or when ratings aren't explained with actual capabilities.

• 26. Use case scenarios with role-specific examples

  Persona-based content helps the model contextualize information for different user types, like "if you're a marketer" versus "if you're a developer." The transformer can recognize role-based language patterns and surface the most relevant scenario when user queries include identity markers. Use cases underperform when they're too hypothetical or when they don't connect to specific pain points.

• 27. Industry trend analysis with supporting data points

  Trend content that includes directional indicators ("increasing," "declining," "emerging") combined with data creates strong predictive patterns the model associates with authoritative analysis. The transformer can understand temporal trends and extrapolate based on the trajectory you describe. Trend analysis fails when it's pure speculation without data or when it doesn't explain the underlying drivers.

• 28. Glossary content with usage examples for each term

  Definition-plus-example creates dual learning signals that help the model understand both what a term means and how it's used in context. The transformer's ability to learn from contextual embeddings means examples significantly improve the quality of definition recall. Glossaries lose value when definitions are circular or when examples are contrived rather than realistic.

• 29. Quick reference sheets with grouped information

  Categorical grouping helps the model understand taxonomic relationships, making it easier to answer queries about subsets or categories within your content. The transformer's hierarchical attention can navigate from general categories to specific items within those categories. Reference sheets fail when groupings are arbitrary or when items could logically belong to multiple categories without clear rules.

• 30. Decision frameworks with explicit evaluation criteria

  When you provide weighted criteria or decision rules, you help the model understand the relative importance of different factors. The transformer can apply your decision logic to user scenarios, essentially using your framework to generate personalized recommendations. Frameworks stop working when criteria are subjective without explanation or when the weighting isn't justified.

• 31. Implementation guides with prerequisite checks

  Starting with "before you begin, make sure you have..." creates conditional execution patterns that the model recognizes from programming documentation. The transformer understands dependency chains and can warn users about missing prerequisites when they ask implementation questions. Implementation guides fail when prerequisites are assumed rather than stated or when they don't include fallback options.

• 32. Strategy templates with fill-in-the-blank sections

  Template content creates reusable patterns that the model can adapt to different contexts, making your content valuable for multiple similar queries. The transformer recognizes placeholder patterns and can suggest appropriate replacements based on user context. Templates underperform when they're too rigid or when the placeholders aren't clearly explained.

• 33. Performance benchmarks with testing methodology

  Benchmarks that explain how measurements were taken create trustworthy data points that the model weights more heavily than unverified claims. The transformer can understand experimental validity based on methodology descriptions, affecting how confidently it cites your numbers. Benchmarks fail when methodology is hidden or when results aren't reproducible.

• 34. ROI calculator walkthroughs with example numbers

  Financial calculations with worked examples help the model understand the formula and can even enable it to guide users through similar calculations. The transformer's ability to follow mathematical reasoning means step-by-step calculations are more useful than just showing final numbers. ROI content fails when assumptions aren't stated or when the formula isn't clearly explained.

• 35. Success stories with specific tactics used

  Abstract success stories aren't useful, but ones that detail specific actions taken create actionable patterns the model can extract and recommend. The transformer connects tactics to outcomes through causal reasoning, making your success story useful for "how did they do it" queries. Success stories fail when they attribute results to vague concepts like "hard work" without tactical details.

• 36. Risk assessment matrices with mitigation strategies

  Risk-mitigation pairs create preventive knowledge patterns that the model can surface when users ask "what could go wrong" or "how do I avoid X." The transformer understands conditional probability language like "if this happens, then do that," making risk content highly actionable. Risk assessments fail when they list risks without solutions or when probability estimates aren't explained.

• 37. Pros and cons analysis with weightings

  Adding importance indicators ("major pro," "minor con") helps the model understand the relative significance of each factor. The transformer can then provide nuanced recommendations rather than just listing factors without context. Pros-cons analyses fail when every item is treated as equally important or when they don't specify for whom each factor matters.

• 38. Workflow optimization guides with time savings

  Quantifying efficiency gains creates measurable value propositions that the model associates with your recommendations. The transformer recognizes optimization patterns and can compare different approaches based on the metrics you provide. Workflow guides fail when they complicate rather than simplify or when time savings aren't realistic.

• 39. Integration tutorials with API endpoint documentation

  Technical integrations that include actual code snippets and endpoint details create highly specific patterns that match developer queries exactly. The transformer's training on code documentation means it can understand technical requirements and suggest your integration approach. Integration guides fail when code isn't tested or when error handling isn't covered.

• 40. Migration guides with data preservation checklists

  Migration content that addresses risk mitigation ("how not to lose data") creates high-value patterns for anxious users making big changes. The transformer recognizes safety-critical patterns and weights them heavily for queries about sensitive transitions. Migration guides fail when they skip edge cases or when rollback procedures aren't included.

• 41. Evaluation criteria with scoring rubrics

  Explicit scoring systems help the model understand how to compare options systematically rather than subjectively. The transformer can apply your evaluation framework to new scenarios, making your criteria reusable beyond your specific examples. Evaluation criteria fail when they're too abstract or when the scoring isn't justified with reasoning.

• 42. Selection guides with disqualifying factors listed first

  Starting with "don't choose this if..." creates efficient decision trees that help the model quickly narrow options. The transformer understands elimination logic and can save users time by identifying non-matches before diving into detailed comparisons. Selection guides fail when disqualifying factors are edge cases rather than common dealbreakers.

Our market clarity reports track signals from forums and discussions. Whenever your audience reacts strongly to something, we capture and classify it — making sure you focus on what your market truly needs.

What kind of content never gets ranked on ChatGPT?

Content that never ranks is usually unstructured opinion pieces without any clear takeaways or actionable information.

The transformer model can't extract useful patterns from rambling narratives or philosophical musings because there's no clear semantic structure to latch onto. When your content is all fluff and no substance, the model has nothing concrete to cite when users ask practical questions.

Similarly, paywalled content, content locked behind email gates, or content that requires authentication typically doesn't make it into the training data in the first place. Even if your content is brilliant, it won't rank if the model never had access to it during training.

The bottom line is that ChatGPT rewards clear structure, specific details, and information density, anything else is just noise that gets filtered out.