AI Verticals With Low Competition

We research AI Wrappers every day, if you're building in this space, get our report

Building an AI startup sounds exciting until you realize ChatGPT already does half of what you planned.

The real opportunities aren't in competing with OpenAI.

They're in specialized verticals where technical complexity and regulatory barriers keep most founders away. These 16 spaces show where ambitious builders can actually win. Check out our 200-page report covering everything you need to know about AI Wrappers to see how successful founders are navigating similar challenges.

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the real user pain points that don't yet have good solutions, so you can build what people want.

16 emerging AI verticals with minimal global competition

• 1. AI for livestock and animal health management

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Computer vision cameras and wearable sensors monitor cattle, pigs, and poultry for disease signs 24-48 hours before visible symptoms appear. Competition stays low because you need massive labeled datasets from diverse farm environments. Devices must survive extreme weather and rough handling. Sales cycles take 12-24 months. Farm profit margins (3-5%) make pricing nearly impossible.

  Who is operating in this space:

  CattleEye uses standard security cameras for body condition scoring. SwineTech prevents piglet deaths with voice recognition. Afimilk monitors milk production through IoT sensors.

  What pain points are not solved:

  False positives hit 15-30%. Farmers get alert fatigue and miss real emergencies. Vendor systems don't talk to each other. Cost barriers at $1,000-5,000+ per animal exclude small farms. Accuracy collapses with mud-covered animals or different breeds.

  Where these problems are discussed: GitHub MPU-6050 Animal Health, StatsCraft Analysis, ResearchGate Study

• 2. AI for construction site safety monitoring

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Real-time computer vision analyzes job site cameras to detect missing PPE and unsafe behaviors. It sends instant alerts with photo evidence and OSHA references. But false alarms hit 15-25% from shadows and weather. Regulations vary by state. Construction sites change daily, forcing constant AI retraining (nobody's solved this). Companies fear liability if the AI misses something.

  Who is operating in this space:

  viAct operates across Asia-Pacific with PPE detection. Newmetrix (acquired by Oracle 2022) predicts safety risks before incidents. DroneDeploy Safety AI uses drones and claims 95% accuracy with 60-70% faster inspections.

  What pain points are not solved:

  False alarms cause 15% productivity loss. Current 85-90% accuracy needs to hit 95%+ to avoid alert fatigue. Workers hiding behind equipment break the detection. AI can't tell if temporary PPE removal makes sense. Legacy integration costs $100K-$500K.

  Where these problems are discussed: MDPI Research, MIT Technology Review, IOSH Magazine

• 3. AI for supply chain carbon footprint tracking

  What it is and why competition is low:

  AI platforms measure greenhouse gas emissions across supply chains. Machine learning spots emission hotspots. Scope 3 emissions (75-90% of total footprints) require data from hundreds of suppliers who guard it fiercely. Different sectors use incompatible methods producing results varying by 200-300%. New regulations like CSRD are still forming.

  Who is operating in this space:

  CO2 AI provides automated Scope 1, 2, and 3 tracking. CarbonChain specializes in commodity chains with 11,000+ suppliers. Climatiq offers carbon intelligence API, named 2024 Gartner "Cool Vendor."

  What pain points are not solved:

  80% of Fortune 500 companies can't get primary emissions data from suppliers. They rely on inaccurate industry averages. Companies can't trace tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers where most emissions happen. Real-time tracking is impossible. 85% of ESG reports contain unverified claims.

  Where these problems are discussed: MIT Sloan, World Economic Forum, McKinsey

• 4. AI for elder care monitoring

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Sensors, cameras, and wearables monitor elderly people living independently. They detect falls and health issues by learning normal patterns. But 60% of elderly and families reject this due to privacy fears. The 65+ demographic has the lowest tech adoption rates. Ethical questions around autonomy versus safety get messy. In family-centric societies, AI monitoring feels like abandoning care duties.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Sensi.AI uses 24/7 audio-only monitoring (no cameras). ElliQ deploys companion robots with AI conversation. CarePredict provides AI wearables for assisted living facilities.

  What pain points are not solved:

  AI systems generate 40-60% false alarms. Caregivers get alert fatigue. Systems can't tell multiple elderly people apart in the same household. AI flags "unusual" behavior that's actually normal for that person. 90% don't connect with Electronic Health Records. At $200-500/month with no insurance coverage, 70% can't afford it.

  Where these problems are discussed: BMC Geriatrics, Nature Scientific Reports, arXiv


In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you which areas are already overcrowded, so you don't waste time or effort.

• 5. AI for food waste reduction

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Smart cameras and scales identify wasted food in restaurants. Machine learning forecasts demand based on weather and history. Restaurant profit margins (3-5%) make $5,000-15,000 AI costs too expensive. 45% of kitchen staff refuse to log waste. They see tracking as surveillance. AI needs months of historical data, but most restaurants don't have any. 90% of restaurants are single locations.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Winnow deploys smart scales in 90+ countries. Clients reduce waste 30-50%. Orbisk helps hotels save €20,000-€60,000 annually. Leanpath operates in 4,000+ locations, typically achieving 50% reduction.

  What pain points are not solved:

  AI can't predict when fresh produce will spoil. This causes 30% of waste. Special events destroy predictions since AI fails during holidays when demand spikes unpredictably. Restaurants with 100+ menu items can't get reliable predictions. AI only tracks waste instead of suggesting how to repurpose ingredients. Small restaurants face 18-24 month payback periods.

  Where these problems are discussed: GitHub Foodzilla, PMC Case Study, ScienceDirect Research

• 6. AI for wildlife conservation and anti-poaching

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Machine learning and computer vision analyze images from camera traps to detect poachers and identify endangered species automatically. Labeled datasets for Australian species, rare animals, or specific regions don't exist at scale. Conservation organizations operate on tiny budgets (typically $250/month). Systems must work without internet in remote areas, last 1.5 years on batteries, and hit 95%+ accuracy in darkness.

  Who is operating in this space:

  TrailGuard AI deploys tiny cameras detecting poachers in under 2 minutes across 100+ reserves. Conservation AI provides real-time species detection, processing 20 million images. Wildlife Protection Solutions processes 65,000 photos daily across 250+ projects.

  What pain points are not solved:

  "At this time there are no Australian species-specific labeled open data-sets. This is by far the biggest challenge." You need thousands of images per species. AI performs poorly on rarely captured animals. Volunteer labeling takes months. Models trained on Washington cows fail on African cows. Finding people who can label audio for specific species in the Amazon is nearly impossible.

  Where these problems are discussed: WILDLABS Community, WILDLABS Discussion, Microsoft CameraTraps

• 7. AI for podcast production and editing

  What it is and why competition is low:

  AI tools remove filler words, trim silences, eliminate background noise, and create social media clips. They reduce 10+ hour editing jobs to under 1 hour. But over-reliance creates "robotic-sounding" episodes listeners notice. Tools only handle 60-70% of workflows. AI-generated clips hit at about 1:3 usable-to-garbage ratio.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Descript provides text-based editing with AI assistant and voice cloning at $12-24/month (4.6/5 stars on G2). Riverside.fm offers browser recording with Magic Clips at $15-24/month. Resound was built by pro audio engineers for free (1 hour/month) or $12/month.

  What pain points are not solved:

  "I wish I can remove filler words but that would make the podcast sound unnatural and choppy." Voice self-consciousness remains: "I don't like to listen to my own voice." AI voice alteration sounds fake. AI struggles to separate overlapping speakers without artifacts. "Descript makes a ton of transcribing mistakes, and I don't catch them all even after three copyedits."

  Where these problems are discussed: LinkedIn Discussion 1, LinkedIn Discussion 2, LinkedIn Discussion 3

• 8. AI for marine aquaculture and fish farming

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Underwater cameras and IoT sensors monitor fish health, water quality, and feeding patterns in real-time. They detect disease before mass mortality events. You need rare combinations of aquaculture biology AND AI expertise. Technology must work underwater in saltwater with limited connectivity. 89% of production is in Asia with small operators and long sales cycles.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Aquabyte uses computer vision for salmon weight estimation after raising $45M. ReelData AI specializes in land-based systems with AI feeding, raising $8M+ Series A. TidalX AI (formerly Google X) tracks biomass across 700+ pens monitoring 50M+ fish.

  What pain points are not solved:

  IoT sensors struggle with simultaneous accurate readings. They drift and need constant manual intervention. AI detects illness but provides only 24-48 hours warning. Models trained on salmon don't work for shrimp or tilapia. Systems cost $50K-$200K+ but productivity gains are hard to prove for farms under 500 tonnes/year.

  Where these problems are discussed: Open Pisciculture GitHub, LinkedIn Industry Discussion, JESIT Academic Paper

• 9. AI for commercial insurance underwriting

  What it is and why competition is low:

  AI automates risk assessment and document processing for complex commercial policies. Weeks-long processes become minutes. Insurance is heavily regulated. AI decisions need explainability and must be bias-free. 62% cite regulatory concerns as the biggest barrier. Underwriters resist "black box" systems. Hundreds of data inputs have zero standardization across carriers.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Sixfold AI generates cited risk insights for Zurich North America. Planck analyzes thousands of data sources and delivers risk insights in under 5 seconds after raising $71M. Gradient AI offers the SAIL platform, raising $56.1M Series C.

  What pain points are not solved:

  Loss run documents contain 350-400 data fields in varying formats with no standardization. Current OCR fails. AI works for routine policies but struggles with unique commercial risks. 55% of CXOs cite AI inaccuracy concerns. 85% agree AI provides competitive advantage yet 82% worry about job displacement. Only 43% trust automated recommendations.

  Where these problems are discussed: LinkedIn Underwriting Process, LinkedIn Broker Conundrum, LinkedIn Underwriting Headaches


In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you which ones are standing out and what strategies they implemented to be that successful, so you can replicate some of them.

• 10. AI for fashion design and trend forecasting

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Computer vision analyzes runway shows, social media, and street style to predict trends 6-18 months ahead. Generative AI creates design variations. 73% of fashion executives say AI is a priority, yet only 28% have actually used it (a 45-point gap). Most AI trains on general images rather than fashion-specific attributes. Micro-trends last 2-3 weeks on TikTok but collection planning happens 12-18 months ahead.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Heuritech analyzes 3M+ social media images daily detecting 2,000+ fashion attributes. Stylumia provides TrueTrend forecasting, Apollo demand prediction, and ImaGenie AI design generation. T-Fashion combines trend search, real-time forecasting, and AI design generation.

  What pain points are not solved:

  AI generates concepts but can't produce production-ready technical specs (pattern grading, seam allowances, fabric calculations). AI can't predict how fabrics will drape or fit different body types without physical prototypes. AI detects TikTok trends in real-time but fashion needs 6-12 months to produce. Collections reach stores after micro-trends died. Who owns AI-generated designs remains legally unclear.

  Where these problems are discussed: Seamly Forum, Pattern Review Community, IEEE Spectrum

• 11. AI for air quality monitoring and prediction

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Machine learning analyzes sensor data to predict pollution levels hours or days ahead. Low-cost sensors need sophisticated calibration. Many experience drift and cross-sensitivities. Most struggle to meet EPA standards. Every water utility operates independently with different infrastructure and data formats. High sensor deployment costs and no standardized protocols limit the market.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Airly operates sensor networks with AI-powered analytics for local governments. Clarity Movement Co. provides Clarity Node-S sensors with "Sensing-as-a-Service" and cloud-based calibration. AQMesh deploys pods with electrochemical sensors for urban monitoring.

  What pain points are not solved:

  Low-cost sensors degrade unpredictably. They need manual recalibration every 3-6 months. Automated remote calibration doesn't work reliably. Electrochemical sensors respond to non-target gases. O3 sensors are affected by NO2 presence. Power failures cause frequent missing data. Relative humidity impacts particulate sensors (up to 50% error) and ML correction models don't generalize across locations.

  Where these problems are discussed: Hacker News Discussion, ACM Technical Forum, MySensors Forum

• 12. AI for patent analysis and prior art search

  What it is and why competition is low:

  NLP and large language models search millions of patents to identify relevant prior art using semantic search. They understand technical concepts across languages and decades. You need deep understanding of patent classification systems, claim construction, and legalistic patent language. Patent databases have inconsistencies, ambiguous terminology, and multiple languages. AI-generated prior art raises novel legal questions.

  Who is operating in this space:

  NLPatent uses proprietary LLMs trained on patent language with 80% time reduction across 170+ million patents. PQAI offers open-source AI patent search with free access across 11 million US patents. IPRally deploys graph-based semantic patent search with AI assistants.

  What pain points are not solved:

  Patent applications in multiple languages struggle with accurate translation. Critical prior art in Chinese, Japanese, or Korean patents is frequently missed. AI tools miss critical prior art in academic papers, conference proceedings, and gray literature. AI systems generate millions of patent claim variations. Practitioners struggle to determine which constitute valid prior art. Abstract idea classification remains inconsistent for software.

  Where these problems are discussed: PatentsView API Issues, PatentsView DB Issues, LinkedIn Patent Search

• 13. AI for property maintenance prediction

  What it is and why competition is low:

  IoT sensors and machine learning predict when building systems (HVAC, elevators, plumbing) will fail by analyzing vibration patterns and temperature. Most buildings operate on legacy BMS lacking modern sensor connectivity. Retrofitting requires significant custom engineering. Predictive models require extensive historical failure data but most property managers lack digitized maintenance records. $30,000+ annual investment per property with unclear ROI.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Lessen provides AI-driven work order management handling 2+ million residential and 1.5+ million commercial work orders annually, reducing human intervention to 25%. Visitt offers AI platforms for commercial buildings using LLMs to identify recurring issues. Augury deploys machine learning for fault detection, saving $35,000 in emergency repairs.

  What pain points are not solved:

  HVAC systems have high false alarm rates. Low tolerance exists for false alarms as they waste technician time. Models trained on commercial offices perform poorly in hospitals or residential buildings. Only 29% of facility managers believe their technicians are "very prepared" to work with predictive systems. AI detects anomalies but struggles to estimate whether components have 1 week or 6 months remaining life.

  Where these problems are discussed: MDPI Academic Discussion, LinkedIn Predictive Maintenance, ResearchGate HVAC Study

• 14. AI for clinical trial patient matching

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Machine learning scans electronic medical records to identify individuals meeting clinical trial eligibility criteria. Manual review takes weeks. AI does it in minutes. HIPAA compliance, IRB approvals, and strict data privacy regulations create high barriers. You need partnerships with hospitals and EMR providers that take years to establish. You need both healthcare domain knowledge AND AI expertise (rare). Healthcare sales cycles take 12-18 months.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Deep 6 AI uses NLP and ML on EMR data. Sites find 25% more patients and accrue 3x faster. Antidote Technologies offers AI-powered matching through partnerships with patient advocacy groups. BEKhealth extracts data from EMRs, claiming 3x more accurate identification.

  What pain points are not solved:

  40% of patient matches still produce screen failures. AI misses nuanced exclusion criteria buried in clinical notes. 80% of clinical trials fail to enroll on time. Dropout rates exceed 30% even after successful matching. AI models struggle to identify underrepresented populations. Each healthcare system uses different EMR formats (Epic, Cerner, Allscripts). Patient health status changes daily but EMR data is often weeks old.

  Where these problems are discussed: LinkedIn Patient Recruitment, LinkedIn Recruitment Challenges, LinkedIn Future of Recruitment


In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you the real challenges upfront - the things that trip up most founders and drain their time, money, or motivation. We think it will be better than learning these painful lessons yourself.

• 15. AI for water quality monitoring and prediction

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Machine learning analyzes sensor data to predict contamination events before they affect drinking water. Every water utility operates independently with different infrastructure, sensors, and data formats. Water utilities are government-run with long procurement cycles (2-3 years), limited budgets, and risk-averse decisions. Effective AI requires extensive IoT sensor networks that many systems lack. Water quality data is often incomplete or missing due to sensor failures.

  Who is operating in this space:

  Xylem Inc. provides AI-Driven Water Analytics for industries and municipalities using IoT sensors for real-time quality monitoring. Hampton Roads Sanitation District developed ML-powered soft sensors for predicting Total Organic Carbon levels. Utah State University created AI monitoring using National Water Model to predict contamination upstream.

  What pain points are not solved:

  AI models make predictions without explaining WHY. This makes it hard for water managers to take preventive action or trust results. IoT sensors fail frequently, require constant calibration, and produce noisy data. Gaps in sensor coverage (especially rural areas) and missing data create blind spots. Water quality varies by location and season but AI models struggle to generalize. Most water utilities have only 2-5 years of quality data, insufficient for training robust models.

  Where these problems are discussed: LinkedIn Water Quality Discussion, GitHub Water Quality Projects, GitHub Water Quality Dataset

• 16. AI for music production for content creators

  What it is and why competition is low:

  Generative AI creates original background music and sound effects for YouTubers, podcasters, and streamers. U.S. Copyright Office rules that fully AI-generated music cannot be copyrighted. Major labels (Universal, Sony, Warner) aggressively sue AI music companies for training on copyrighted works. Music has multi-layered copyrights (composition, sound recording, performance) creating complex licensing. Every AI music model risks copyright infringement lawsuits.

  Who is operating in this space:

  SOUNDRAW trained exclusively on in-house music (no scraped content) offering royalty-free beats with 100% royalty ownership. AIVA specializes in classical and cinematic AI-generated pieces with full copyright ownership. Soundful provides AI-powered music studio with 150+ style templates and commercial licensing.

  What pain points are not solved:

  U.S. courts ruled in March 2025 that AI-generated works without human authorship cannot be copyrighted. Massive uncertainty exists about whether creators can legally monetize AI music on YouTube or Spotify. AI-generated music gets flagged by YouTube's Content ID as copyright infringement even when properly licensed. AI tools can't make nuanced creative decisions about dynamics or emotion. Most companies won't disclose what data their models were trained on. AI tools that clone artists' voices face increasing legal challenges.

  Where these problems are discussed: VI-Control Forum, GitHub AI Audio Startups, AVIXA Discussion

In our 200+-page report on AI wrappers, we'll show you dozens of examples of great distribution strategies, with breakdowns you can copy.

These 16 verticals reveal a consistent pattern. Technical complexity intersects with domain expertise in ways that exclude generalist AI companies. You cannot build effective livestock monitoring without understanding animal behavior or fashion forecasting without grasping draping.

Data scarcity creates natural moats. Wildlife conservation lacks Australian species datasets. Commercial insurance struggles with fragmented formats. Water quality monitoring faces sparse sensor coverage that takes years to build. We analyze similar moat-building strategies in our report covering the AI Wrapper market.

Regulatory uncertainty and liability exposure keep venture capital away. Elder care monitoring privacy concerns. Copyright chaos in AI-generated music. Patent office frameworks still evolving. Cultural resistance slows market development. Construction workers resist safety monitoring. Restaurant chefs reject AI that "removes the art." Fashion executives maintain a 45-point gap between stated AI priorities and actual usage.

The startups succeeding share common traits. Deep domain expertise combined with AI capabilities. Willingness to accept longer sales cycles. Focus on hybrid human-AI approaches. Patience to build proprietary datasets that become valuable over time.

The opportunities exist because they're hard. That difficulty is the moat.